Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On July 8, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on July 8, 2012, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on August 10, 2012.
B. On January 24, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute “a well-founded fear that would be detrimental” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.
(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.
On March 5, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 5, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on September 30, 2014.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including virtual number), Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. On March 28, 2008, the Plaintiff’s assertion took part in QM as a party to the failure in order to assist the persons suffering from imminent distress from the members of the Quomi Mo at the Pakistan on March 28, 2008, and on February 25, 201, the Plaintiff joined and joined the PTI (Pkistan Tke Inc.) on February 25, 201 after withdrawing the NP on February 15, 201.
Around March 2011, the Plaintiff, as seen above, withdrawn from the NTPP and subscribed to the PTPP, thereby threatening the Plaintiff to find the Plaintiff’s new store at the Plaintiff’s stores and threaten the Plaintiff to “not to leave the Plaintiff’s new store without having to leave the Plaintiff from the PTPP.”
In addition, around March 15, 2012, the Plaintiff was threatened by two people who were not aware of who was her being her, who were on the house boarding and a house. On April 1, 2012, the Plaintiff was in dialogue with her friendly job offers B and C from the stairs of A-1 hospital, but two her son was killed by launching her her gun.
As such, the Plaintiff is a member of political, religious, and specific social groups.