logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.22 2014나45975
대여금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, parts of the judgment against Defendant C, D, F, I, J, K, M (Defendant 8), N,O, P, T (Defendant 13), U,Y, AB, and AC are respectively applicable.

Reasons

Basic Facts

“AL reconstruction association” (a non-corporate body, not an organization authorized to establish a reconstruction association, but a non-corporate body voluntarily organized for reconstruction purposes, not an organization which has obtained authorization for establishment of a reconstruction association, is called “AL land” (hereinafter referred to as “AL land”).

The name of the representative of Defendant C, F, J, K, and M (Defendant 8), which was the co-owner of the first instance trial, is the co-defendant of the first instance trial (hereinafter “AL reconstruction association”), the actual representative of Defendant C, F, J, K, and M (hereinafter “AL reconstruction association”), is N. on May 28, 2003, the name of the representative of AM and AL reconstruction association is to be removed, and the existing building is to be built on the ground of 947 square meters outside the AL land, and a building of 2,367 square meters in total floor area is to be sold to the association members. The AM provides land and contributions to the association members. The AM, as an executor, provides loans necessary for the implementation of the project (the moving expenses are to be leased by the executor, but the members shall pay additional damages for delay applying the overdue interest rate), and the reconstruction project is to be executed by the head of the competent Gu as a new construction project of the AL complex (hereinafter “the reconstruction project”).

“AO reconstruction association” (a non-corporate group voluntarily organized for reconstruction, like the above AL reconstruction association, for the purpose of the purpose of the reconstruction project and the construction of officetels at this place, is the land of the above AO (hereinafter referred to as “AO”).

(A) AP, the actual representative of Defendant D, I, T (Defendant 13), N,O, P, Q, U,Y, AB, AC, AF, AF, AG, AH, and 34 members, including the AH, were co-owners; hereinafter referred to as “AO reconstruction association”), was the AP on June 16, 200.

arrow