A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who obtained permission to possess an air gun from January 19, 2009 to January 17, 2014.

At around 23:00 on 23:00 on the street, the Defendant: (a) had been in dispute with the victim D on one occasion due to the operation of the victim D and the autonomous crime prevention zone; (b) had been in conflict with the victim on one occasion; (c) had been in conflict with the air gun (or air gun (or air gun 5.0 meters wide, No. 1) which is a dangerous object stored in the between the passenger car owned by the Defendant and the vehicle owned by the Defendant; and (d) had been in conflict with the victim on one occasion, and used the gun for the purpose other than the permitted purpose without good cause.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The second police statement to E;

1. Seizure record and list;

1. A gun possession permit;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of criminal implements;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 73 (1) and Article 17 (2) of the Control of Firearms, Swords, Explosives, Etc. Act (the use for which permission for a gun has been granted and the choice of imprisonment is chosen);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments in the above two crimes);

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation include the confessions and reflects of all the instant crimes at latest, the Defendant appears to have committed any contingent crime by taking advantage of the victim’s face while drunkly under the influence of alcohol. The victim also has considerable responsibility for the occurrence of the instant crime, the victim does not want the punishment of the Defendant by mutual consent with the victim immediately after the instant crime is committed, the Defendant does not have any previous criminal record or criminal record of suspended execution, and the Defendant has no previous criminal record or criminal record of suspended execution or above for more than 10 years.