logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.05.22 2014고정415
업무상과실치상
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are employees working for the Home Plus Government Points in the Guide Plus-dong 475-1 of the Guide Government-si.

On July 9, 2013, at around 16:30, the Defendants, at the second floor of the “The Homepler Government Point”, operated a hydrogen carrying the goods in the food store. Defendant A, who was towed before the said river, was moved from the back to the lower part of the said river.

In such a case, the Defendants had a duty of care to pay attention in advance to prevent customers from conflicting by reducing the speed of transport and ensuring that they do not conflict with the customers before, after, after and after the time of the mixed store.

Nevertheless, the Defendants did not reduce the speed of transport in the way of the mixed store, and did not properly look at the breath and the left and the right of the shopping car in the above store. However, the Defendants suffered from the following: (a) by negligence, the shopping cart installed in the front of the victim C (Y, 28 years of age) in nine months of pregnancy where the said shopping car was breadbing breath in the above store; (b) the said shopping cart’s hand booms the victim’s clothes; and (c) continued to breath the part of the said shopping cart’s back breath under the back breath of the said shopping car, which caused the victim to suffer approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to inflict bodily injury on the victim by negligence in the above business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to C by the police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes stated in a written diagnosis;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 268 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires consideration, such as that the Defendants deposited one million won each for the victim after the closing of argument.

arrow