A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2017, around 23:49, the Defendant driven a Brober car in the Bland while under the influence of approximately 0.219% alcohol concentration on the part of approximately 800 meters from the front of the Grogym club to the Grogian cafeteria located in the same Eup/Myeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include: (a) the high alcohol concentration among the blood of this case; (b) the attitude at the time of measurement was bad; and (c) the fact that a person was under suspension of indictment on August 2017 without being aware of the fact that he/she was under suspension of indictment; and (d) the fact that he/she was under suspension of indictment for only two months; (b) there was no record of criminal punishment except a fine for a different species of light in 2000; and (c) there was no record of criminal punishment except the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the crime, etc.; and (d) the punishment as set forth in the text of the instant case is determined by taking into account