1. The Defendant is based on the termination of title trust on July 20, 2016, on the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff.

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act:

3. Part of the period of partial termination (the part concerning the claim for the receipt of fines for negligence and taxes and public charges) The Plaintiff asserts that the fine for negligence and public charges imposed on the automobiles listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant automobiles”) should be borne by the title truster of the instant automobiles and the Defendant who actually operated the instant automobiles, not by the Plaintiff, who is the title trustee of the instant automobiles. As such, the Defendant is obligated to take the responsibility for the payment of fines and public charges imposed after March 17, 2014 from the Plaintiff.

However, even though the administrative fines and taxes and public charges alleged by the Plaintiff for acceptance are imposed on the Plaintiff, it is difficult to view that the Defendant, as a matter of course, bears the obligation to pay the above administrative fines and public charges, regardless of the Defendant’s burden on the Plaintiff to pay the above administrative fines and public charges, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that there was an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to accept the above payment obligation. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.