The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Summary of misunderstanding of facts from the victim

There is no fact that the Gu was received, and even though the defendant attempted to leave, he was unable to prevent the victim from leaving the place.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the statement of the victim's eviction as stated in the judgment below

It may be fully recognized that the Gu has refused to comply with the request.

㈎ E은 수사기관 및 원심법정에서 피고인이 피해자의 집에 들어온 뒤 몇 분 지나 큰소리가 들려 피해자의 집인 1층으로 내려갔더니 피해자가 피고인에게 나가 달라고 요구하고 있었고 자신도 피고인에게 나가라고 하였으나, 피고인이 안 나간다고 하여 경찰에 신고한 후 다시 피해자의 집으로 내려갔으며, 그동안 피해자와 그 처가 계속 나가라고 이야기하고 있었다고 일관되게 진술하였다.

㈏ 피해자는 2014. 5. 22. 22:25경 112신고를 하였고, 이후 E도 같은 날 22:31경 112신고를 하였다.

F, upon receipt of the above report, the victim and his wife stated that “at the time of the dispatch in the court of original trial, the victim and the victim met only because they were threatened.” They stated that the other police officers, who talked with the victim’s husband and wife, talked with the victim, did not come to the Defendant during the process of arresting the Defendant.

㈐ I도 원심법정에서 자신이 피해자의 집에 가기 전...