logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.08.17 2016고단2595
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The act of violating the restriction on the operation of vehicles by the road management agency on the front of the road management office in the front of the Gannam Highway-dong Office around December 17, 1994, where the employee of the specific defendant in the facts charged, was found guilty of the defendant under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act and the summary of the judgment against the defendant under Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the ground that the punishment law applied to the summary order subject to review becomes retroactively null and void pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24 decided December 29, 201).

arrow