A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in the support of the Daejeon District Court Seosan on February 9, 2007, and a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of road traffic law at the Seoul Central District Court on October 5, 2009.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or injury caused before the risk) was under the influence of alcohol 0.116% during blood, and thus, the Defendant was in a state of difficulty in driving under normal conditions due to the influence of alcohol leveling 0.16% during blood, making the face rash, making the horses difficult, and making the rash difficult.

On December 16, 2015, the Defendant driven Dworket No. 1, 01:57, while under the influence of alcohol, and traveling along the front road of Mapo-gu Seoul, Seoul from the upstream to the intersection, and had the Defendant use the victim F (V, 24 years old) in front of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, and had the victim use the victim on the road, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as a 5-lane in front of the left 16 weeks of needing medical treatment.

After all, the Defendant was injured by driving a motor vehicle while it is difficult to drive the motor vehicle normally due to influence of drinking.

2. Although the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice as indicated in the criminal records, he/she driven a D rocketing car under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.116% in the blood alcohol level at the same time and at the same place as paragraph 1, even though he/she violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

3. When a traffic accident occurred, such as paragraph (1) at the same time and place as that provided in paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) was a female-friendly G who was on board to conceal the fact; and (b) the Defendant was a female-friendly G who was on board to conceal the fact.

In order to make a false statement to the effect that “a request for statement” was made, the said G had the said G interfered with making a false statement.

The Defendant, on December 16, 2015, ordered G to do so.