The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (two years and six months of imprisonment, and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected.

However, each of the crimes of this case is that the defendant opened each clothes where the defendant's bath was corrected using drber, stolen from 20 victims on 13 occasions the wallet containing cash and cards owned by the victims. In light of the criminal law and the degree of damage of the defendant, the crime quality of the crime is not less and less than that of the defendant, and the defendant did not make a serious effort to pay damages, and the defendant did not reach an agreement between the defendant and the victims until the trial. The defendant did not recover from damage, and the defendant has already been punished seven times for the same crime (the records that were sentenced six times among them) are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the above favorable circumstances and conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstances after the commission of the crime, and other various circumstances, which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the trial process, even if considering all favorable circumstances for the Defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair since the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.