Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than two months.

214,00 won shall be collected from each of the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on December 23, 2015, and the judgment was finalized on April 2, 2016. Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Western District Court on November 17, 2015 and the judgment was finalized on May 3, 2016.

Even if the Defendants were not the narcotics handler, they dealt with the Metropoper (the clopon, the copon, the copon; hereinafter the copon) of narcotics as follows:

1. Defendant B, on August 2015, the first instance court rendered free of charge the fact that Defendant B, at a Moel room where it is difficult to know the trade name in the Hoyang-si Hodong-dong, he was given a vinyl of approximately 0.3g of philopon to A.

2. Defendant A

A. On August 2015, the Defendant received free of charge a vinyl bomer, which contained approximately 0.3g of a philopon, from a Moel room where it is difficult to know the trade name in the Anyang-si Hodong-dong.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above paragraph A, administered phiphones in a manner that inhales the smoke emitted by heating the phiphones into a string and then inhales the phiphones by using strings as soon as possible, at the bottom of the said paragraph.

(c)

On August 2015, the Defendant administered a philophone in a manner that inhales the smoke generated by heating the bottom of the philophone into a string in the passenger car of the Defendant parked in the underground parking lot of the building in the E neighboring E-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, an Ansan-si, and inhales the philophone by using the string as soon as it was made by the string.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Copy of the police statement made to F;

1. Investigation report (to attach a response letter to a request for appraisal);

1. Previous records: The screen of output as a result of inquiry into each consolidated case, and the application of duplicate Acts and subordinate statutes of each judgment;

1. Defendants of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment: Narcotics, etc.