logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.12.11 2013가합20383
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 4,258,00 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) for KRW 4,258,00 and for this, from November 24, 2013 to December 11, 2014.

Reasons

A. The defendant is a corporation, and the defendant is a person operating C, which is a man-made company.

B. Around May 2012, the Defendant, at the window of Changwon-si, entrusted the remodeling construction of the Mael (hereinafter “instant telecom”).

C. On April 25, 2012, the Defendant received a written estimate from the Plaintiff to subcontract the said remodeling construction to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a construction subcontract with the same content as the said written estimate (hereinafter “instant construction”), and completed the instant construction work in accordance with the said written estimate.

견 적 서 * 공사명 : 모텔샤시공사 견적일자 : 2012년 4월 25일 현장 : 창원E모텔 합계 금액 : 일금 일천팔백구십육만팔천 원 정 품명 규격 단위 수량 단가(원) 금액(원) 비고 샤시공사 PVC샤시 식 1 18,968,000 18,968,000 ◈ 세부내역 ◈ 룸 샤시 1300*1300*115 EA 18 145,000 2,610,000 유리포함 룸 샤시 1230*1230*115 EA 18 135,000 2,430,000 유리포함 계단 샤시 860*1250*115 EA 10 104,000 1,040,000 유리포함 화장실 스텐후렘 1400*2100*190 식 36 220,000 7,920,000 유리 5t 투명 평 504 2,000 1,008,000 강화도아 700*2070 장 36 110,000 3,960,000 합계 18,968,000

D. In addition, at the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff concluded a contract to install two automatic entrance doors of the first floor of the instant telecom and three entrance doors of the first floor of the instant telecom, and constructed them.

E. The Defendant paid KRW 36,300,000 to the Plaintiff on the instant construction cost, installation cost of entrance, etc. as follows.

On May 3, 2012, F (A) 10,000,000 on May 3, 2012, 201, F (A) 5,000,000,003 June 26, 2012, F (A) 11,000,000,000 on June 26, 2012, F (A) 11,000,000,000 on June 28, 2012 (A) 6,30,000,006 on July 21, 2012, 200 (A) 2,00,000,000 total 30,300,000,000 on August 8, 2012, with no dispute over each of subparagraph 1, 3,000 evidence No.

arrow