The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be reversed.

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable. 2. Although the judgment of this court was delivered several times to the defendant for a similar type of crime, the defendant again does not commit such a crime, and his mistake is divided in depth. The defendant seems to be an employee after receiving monthly salary at a business establishment arranging sexual traffic, the defendant's age, character and behavior, risk of recidivism, family attitude, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc. are considered to be too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal by the defendant is justifiable, the judgment of the first instance is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment is again rendered following the pleadings.

The criminal facts and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are the same as that of the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts and Articles 19(2)1 and 30 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.