logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.18 2015나103539
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment] Part 2, Chapters 8 through 11 are as follows.

B. ① In providing a cart to the users of the Defendant’s workplace, the Defendant neglected to perform the duty of care to manage the cart properly so that the accident may not occur, thereby causing the Plaintiff’s injury. ② The parking lot surface of the Defendant’s workplace is in a slope towards the Manle of the drainage hole and the surface is at risk of using the cart with heavy goods, so the Defendant neglected the duty of care to assign safety management personnel to prevent this, and the Plaintiff, who was towing the cart from a slope, caused the above injury to the Defendant, and caused the above injury to the Defendant. ③ The Defendant, despite the Plaintiff’s duty of care to keep a large quantity of 1 cart which is capable of carrying large quantity of goods as the Plaintiff, with additional 100,000 won and 400,000 won and 50,000 won and 40,000 won and 50,000 won and 40,000 won and 50,000 won, respectively, were to be paid to the Plaintiff.

Part 2 "" was referred to in Part 19.

or the defendant.

arrow