Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Ctheme.
On August 30, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 19:05, and proceeded directly from the south of Korea to the direction of 200 South Korean Won, one lane in the letter D at Seopopo-si.
In such a case, the driver had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering gear and operating the steering gear, after checking whether there is a vehicle that enables the driver to reduce the speed and to check well the right and the right of the way and the right and the right of the vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant’s negligence of neglecting the duty on the front side and the left side of the motor vehicle, which was going to the left side from the right side of the course to the left side of the collision course due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure to perform the duty on the front side and the left side of the motor vehicle of the victim E (38 Do) driving, was shocked by the front side of the motor vehicle of the said test.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence on the part of the victim E, approximately 7 weeks of cage cage cage cage cage cages, etc. from the victim G (n, 38 years of age) who was on board the damaged vehicle for about 3 weeks of medical treatment, injury such as brain cage cryp, etc., which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment to the same victim H (5 years of age), and injury such as cage cages of the right cage cage cage cages, etc., which require approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment to the same victim I (1 years of age), and at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping the said cage hump car owned by the victim Co., Ltd. to the extent that the repair cost is destroyed to the extent that it does not take necessary measures, such as aiding the victims.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement to E, J and K;
1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident;
1. On-site and vehicle photographs;
1. 112 No. 1. The receipt and processing table of the accident of this case