1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,750,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from January 22, 2016 to September 19, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 23, 2012, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer under one’s name on the ground of sale due to the voluntary auction conducted on August 23, 2012, 2012, with respect to C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, and C, C, C, and C, C, C, and C, C (hereinafter “instant building”). On January 26, 2012, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer under one’s name as to the instant building No. 206 (hereinafter “206”) on the ground of sale conducted on January 26, 2012.

B. On March 10, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with D to lease subparagraph 206 with a deposit of KRW 5 million, monthly rent of KRW 300,000, and period of lease until March 21, 2016, and E has been continuously residing from March 2014 to March 206.

(c) around October 2015, water flowing from outer walls No. 206 continuously flows along with the windows and outer walls of 106, and water has continuously deteriorated from the small scale of 106.

(hereinafter “instant water accident”). D.

On November 2015, the Plaintiff performed the internal construction works referred to in 106, such as Dogdog Construction, Round Construction, Dogering Construction, boiler Installation, Denmark Construction, and Electrical Construction.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 17, 18 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's entries, images, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. As a result of the water leakage that began from No. 206 around 2012, the gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the remote area of 106 was milked in water and water under the market.

In addition, the water leakage accident of this case occurred due to the defects of pipes attached to the floor of 206 around 2015, and due to this, damage was caused by the ceiling, decoration, electric facilities in 106.

Therefore, in 2012, the plaintiff performed a glaging, decoration, and glaging construction. In 2015, around 2015, the plaintiff performed a construction work such as a wall, ceiling, board, etc., and in the future, it is necessary to perform an internal cement, new, and brick construction work in 106.

Therefore, the defendant.