beta
Text
Defendant
In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent are dismissed.
65 days out of the number of days of confinement before the pronouncement of this judgment.
Reasons
The grounds for appeal and the judgment of the defendant and the defendant and the respondent for identification (hereinafter referred to as the "defendants") and the defense counsel's grounds for appeal are too harsh to the sentencing and protective custody disposition of the court below.
However, in this case where the criminal defendant committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) committed by the defendant is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three years, and there is no reason for repeated mitigation of the defendant, it is reasonable for the court below to render a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year and six months which is the lowest punishment after mitigation as stated in its reasoning
In addition, according to the records, the defendant, as stated in the first head of the crime in the judgment below, was sentenced to a punishment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and was released from prison for the same or a similar crime, etc., and again committed a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes again within 6 months after he was discharged from prison on June 21, 2000, and again committed a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the thief) again within 6 months after he was discharged from prison. In light of the facts as stated in the first head of the crime in the judgment of the court below, it can be recognized as a habit of larceny in light of the following facts: in addition, in light of the defendant's past criminal behaviors, behaviors, and family environment, it is judged that there is a risk of
Therefore, all appeals by defendants are dismissed, and 65 days out of the number of days of confinement before the pronouncement of this judgment shall be included in the punishment of the original judgment.
July 5, 2001