A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) was a person who is engaged in the business of driving B rocketing taxi, and the Defendant came to drive C-lane by driving the said taxi along C-lane with two-lanes of flow from the new basin by driving the said taxi, even though it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the said taxi in such a situation as 0.132% of alcohol content in the state of under the influence of alcohol around 12:02 on December 25, 2019.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent collision of the vehicle in front and rear by accurately operating the brake system and the transmission transmission system of the vehicle in the case of the driver of the vehicle. The driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent collision of the vehicle in front and rear by putting the vehicle down from the slope, turning the vehicle down from the slope, turning off, or moving back.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to operate the speed speed system of vehicles without properly operating the speed change system, and operated the speed change system arbitrarily, and continued in the future, followed by the victim D(the age of 41) who was in the front and the signal signal at the front of the Defendant’s taxi, and got a driver to the front ender of the Defendant’s taxi, followed again by erroneous operation of the speed change system, while driving by the victim F.F. (the age of 64) who was in the front and rear of the signal signal at the rear, while driving by the Defendant, the front ender of the Gststyna taxi driven by the victim F.F. (the age of 64) who was in the front and rear of the signal at the rear.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above occupational negligence to the victim H(W, 20 years of age), victim I(60), victim J(31 years of age), victim K(60 years of age), victim L(49 years of age), victim M(65 years of age), and victim N(n) respectively.