A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112, prior to the “C convenience store” located in Kuri-si B on February 11, 2017; (b) “In so far as she enters the house, she went away, she her frighted, and her young 2 gue was frighted,” and received a report from the head of the Guri Police Station D District E, etc., to confirm the reported details, and caused the disturbance to go home due to her exposure, and paying expenses to the neighbors.”

At around 11:30 on the same day, the defendant discovered the above E in the patrol region with another 112 reported cases and found the same E in the same region, and he / she gets a bath for the defendant to not properly handle the reported cases, and the above E / her face was sent one time to the defendant as he / she was able to return home to the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of recommended punishment] There is no basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person who is subject to special sentencing] [decision of sentence] that the defendant has a criminal record of suspended execution and a criminal record of violence, and consideration of the fact that the defendant is against one another, etc.