beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 19, 2017, the Defendant driving a B Spact-type car with alcohol concentration under the influence of alcohol concentration in the blood around 00:07, and driving the car at one lane between the two-lanes in the middle of the site in the front city of the original city as a shooting distance in the site in the front city of the original city.
At the time, the Defendant followed the victim D(45) Eststynasi in driving. In such a case, the Defendant, who was engaged in driving of the automobile, had a duty of care to properly manipulate the speed peds and brakes in line with the progress of the vehicle that was driven before, thereby preventing the accident in advance. However, due to the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was due to occupational negligence by failing to properly operate the speed peds and brakes in line with the speed of the said taxi while it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the vehicle normally, due to the Defendant’s failure to properly operate the speed peds and brakes, the part behind the said taxi was moved into the front ped part of the Defendant’s vehicle. On three consecutive occasions, the Defendant was led to the front ped part of the said taxi, thereby causing the Defendant’s injury, such as salkes and tensions, which require treatment for about two weeks, and the victim F, passenger F, passenger, and 33 years old, by causing the injury to each of the said taxi.
2. A defendant who has driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as causing a traffic accident at the above location at around 00:24 on the same day, under the influence of alcohol, such as influence of pedestrians, apprehension of walking, influence of smell, smelling, and detection of drinking reaction due to a drinking reduction on the same day;
인 정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어, 경찰공무원으로부터 4회에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주 측정에 응할 것을 요구 받았음에도, 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 등 정당한 사유 없이 이에 응하지 아니하였다.
Summary of Evidence
1..