A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 19, 2016, at around 21:00 to 23:30, the Defendant opened the above office entrance to the key held in Pyeongtaek-si B, and intruded into the office room of the victim D, who is the regular manager of the said C in advance, by putting 2 spokes into the upper spokes of the west, and destroying the epode correction device and destroying the epode, and then 3.3 million won in cash owned by the victim and stored in the epode. The summary of the evidence was stolen.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of E and D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs and the contents of letters;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination on the application of sentencing guidelines to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order: the sentence which is lower than the sentencing guidelines by taking into account all circumstances, such as the fact that the basic area (one to two years) is contrary to the four types of theft in general property (the theft in intrusion) and the amount of damage, etc.;