logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.13 2016누45976
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "No. 11" is added to "Evidence No. 43 of the judgment of the court of first instance; "The facts" are as follows; "The facts" are as follows: "The conviction of a fine of 2,50,000 won (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2015Ma4592) is sentenced and confirmed in a criminal case of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) against the plaintiff; and "the final facts" are as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for deletion of No. 1 of the week; therefore, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow