1. Defendant H, I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, and U jointly with the Plaintiff A, KRW 100,200,00,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 133,80 for the Plaintiff C.

1. Determination on the claim for damages caused by land sale fraud

A. The Defendants, other than Defendant V, W, X, andY, filed a claim against the remaining Defendants, 1) structure of the Land Fraud Group; (1) the content of the division of duties; (2) the Defendants, other than Defendant V, W, X, andY, have a position system consisting of advisers, presidents, presidents, directors, executive directors, office chiefs, and deputy governors, and had them appear to run a normal real estate development company externally; and (3) repeatedly accepted Defendant V (closed on August 20, 2012), Defendant W on August 13, 2012, Defendant X, X on August 16, 2012; and (4) the head of the relevant district office of education established the Seoul Special Metropolitan City’s main method of purchasing land in sequence on September 20, 201 through 10; and (4) the head of the relevant district office of education.

(2) Defendant H was in charge of the business planning, the purchase of goods, the management of funds, and the management of funds for the chief executive officer, etc. under the direction of Defendant H as “the president,” and Defendant A was in charge of the business of establishing a business plan, the purchase of goods, the overall management of funds, the establishment of a plan for the management of funds, and the provision of education for the chief executive officer. Defendant M was in charge of registration, such as requesting a certified judicial scrivener with the chief of the general affairs department to engage in the transactional relationship with the chief of the office, and Defendant L was in charge of the management of land purchase price, the payment of wages and allowances for employees, and the payment of funds for Defendant H requested individual. Defendant P continued to work for Defendant H around early 208 with Defendant H, while managing its employees as Defendant X’s auditor and vice chief.