1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows additional evidence.

Therefore, the reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is that the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance is the same as that for the part of the judgment of the first instance, except where the respective “satisfy group” of the second, fourth, and third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, and third, third, third, third, third, third, and third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third,

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance which accepted the plaintiff's main claim and the counterclaim is justifiable. Thus, all appeals against the main claim and counterclaim of this case are dismissed as they are without merit.

However, as it is apparent that the “satisfe-gun” in Article 211(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a clerical error in the text of the judgment of the court of first instance, it is decided to ex officio correct it as “Satcheon-gun” under Article 211(1) of the same Act.