The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (4 million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is a favorable sentencing condition for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim through criminal conciliation procedures, and that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine.

However, the crime of this case is committed by taking advantage of the victim who was in the opposite direction to the left by the defendant's negligence at the center line, and caused the victim to suffer an injury in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment. The defendant's liability is not mitigated. The court below seems to have determined the punishment by reducing the fine amount of the summary order (five million won) by taking into account the sentencing conditions favorable to the defendant. There is no change of circumstances that can change the sentence of the court below in the first instance trial, and other circumstances that form the conditions of the punishment of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, etc., the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above unfair assertion of sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.