logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.05.10 2016구합104486
견책처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On September 1, 1982, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as a middle school teacher, and on March 1, 2015, the Plaintiff served as a principal of Cmiddle School on March 1, 2015, and served as the principal of D Middle School since February 17, 2016.

On November 24, 2015, the Office of Education of Sejong Special Self-Governing City received civil petitions against the plaintiffs who worked as the principals of Cmiddle Schools, conducted a field investigation into Cmiddle Schools, and requested the auditor office of the above Office of Education to audit the plaintiffs on November 25, 2015.

From December 17, 2015 to December 22, 2015, Sejong Special Self-Governing City Office of Education audited the Plaintiff’s improper speech and behavior, and accordingly, the Defendant requested a minor disciplinary resolution against the Plaintiff on February 25, 2016.

On November 23, 2015, the head of the school exercised pressure to disclose the evaluation scores of teachers' ability development and to prepare a vindication for raising an objection to the results of the evaluation of teachers' ability development of the school principal - around 38 minutes after confirming whether the teachers who evaluate themselves in the special meeting of teachers and staff held a temporary teachers' meeting as a school room, and confirming whether they attend the meeting, and then 38 minutes of the 38 minutes of the 38 minutes of the 6th day "the students are 40% of the internal letter so that they are able to write 40% at this time and go to another school. A fixed-term teacher has no re-contract for six months."

On December 1, 2015, at the meeting of the head of the school stressed that “The pressure is exercised to ensure that the teachers participating in the survey on the management satisfaction of the principal have the authority of the principal and to enhance the evaluation score” - “at the low score in the evaluation of the teachers’ ability development in the branch, it would be good that the principal would not be issued, if any, because there is an opportunity at the next time.”

- At the meeting of the Department on December 18, 2015, schools must show a simple figure in the assessment of assistant principals and the assessment of satisfaction with school management.

The Sejong Science and Arts Academy.

arrow