1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the appeal cost, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff asserted that the lease contract was terminated due to nonperformance of the Defendant’s lease contract, such as the leakage of the leased object of this case, and filed a claim for a counterclaim seeking the return of the lease deposit and the payment of damages due to leakage. In order to identify the water source, the Defendant filed a claim for a counterclaim seeking the payment of the cost of restoring the outside toilet floor, which was removed in the first instance trial’s appraisal process, and the claim for a counterclaim was dismissed, and it is obvious that only the Plaintiff filed an appeal.

Therefore, only the principal claim is subject to the judgment of this court.

2. The reasons why the party member of the court of first instance should explain this case are as follows: (a) the part concerning the defendant's assertion "as to the defendant's counterclaim" and the part concerning the defendant's counterclaim from 8th to 9th 5th ; (b) the part concerning the plaintiff's counterclaim from 6th 4 to 11th ; (c) the part concerning the plaintiff's counterclaim from 8th 17th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e; and (d) the part concerning "the plaintiff" from 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e of this case.

3. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.