Text
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance.
Reasons
1. The reasoning in this case is as follows: (a) the court’s explanation is to change the term “ July 9, 2014” of the first instance judgment to “ July 11, 2014” on the two pages 2 of the first instance judgment; and (b) other than adding the same as that of the second instance judgment, the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of the second instance judgment; and (c) thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act
2. The defendant's decision in this court (the defendant's main defense) is not an administrative disposition that is subject to appeal litigation because the defendant's decision is only a recommended effect and it cannot affect the party's legal status or legal relationship.
[Judgment] In order for a specific administrative agency’s act to constitute an exercise of public authority, which is subject to appeal litigation, the administrative agency’s act must meet the two requirements that the administrative agency’s act has the nature of public authority and the effect derived from such an act affects the Plaintiff’s legal status.
Therefore, if an applicant does not have the right to file a petition under statutes or cooking, the rejection by an administrative agency of the application does not affect the legal interests of the applicant, and thus, it is not subject to appeal litigation.
However, in a case where an applicant has the right to respond to an administrative agency's request as a right to seek an answer to an administrative agency due to law or sound reasoning, even though the benefits or services, etc. sought by the applicant are not legally within the legal meaning, an administrative agency's rejection (e.g., rejection, rejection, and rejection) is an infringement of procedural rights, or an act of refusing to make a decision on the applicant's request (e.g., rejection, rejection) is an infringement of procedural rights, or an act of refusing to take a disposition (e., rejection, rejection) except when the administrative