A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2019 Highest 1267]

1. Around July 26, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the ground that the victim D (the 17-year-old) who is his/her his/her father’s father’s husband’s wife gave a verbal reply to E in his/her mother-child at his/her residence on July 26, 2019, and that he/she met with the victim’s buckbucks, and that the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s hand

2. On July 26, 2019, at the same place as Paragraph 1, around 21:50 on July 26, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the said G’s body on one occasion as a defect by G, who was dispatched after receiving a report from the said D on the 112-report that “Isday, Esday, Esday, and Esday,” and was called “Isday, Esday, Esday, and Esday,” to check the said D’s content.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

[200 order 703] The defendant is a person who drives HWW125 Meba.

On April 15:56, 2020, the Defendant came to turn to the left at one lane out of the 7th line of the 7th line of the 7th line of the apartment.

Since there is a private street intersection where normal signal is operated, it is confirmed whether a person engaged in the driving of motor vehicles has a motor vehicle traveling along the intersection by reducing the speed and checking well the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the traffic signal and prevent the accident in advance. However, even though the signal has been changed to the front stop signal, the defendant is not negligent in his/her duty and the left and left-hand turn in violation of the signal.

According to normal signal, the part of the part of the crime in front of the driver's seat of the Ki 40 vehicle driving by the victim J (J, 35 years old) (J) who was going straight from six lanes of the six-lanes of the 6-lanes of the 6-lanes from the entrance distance of the Jeonnam-do Office at the entrance of the Jeonnam-do Office, was shocked into the right side of the Defendant's driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant is above.