(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.11 2015가단214383

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.11 2015가단214383

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against Plaintiff A, KRW 38,420,422, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, and each of the said amounts.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 20:12 on November 10, 2014, Defendant D, who driven a high scar of E (hereinafter “instant sea vehicle”) and went to the left of the Republic of Korea at the time of port on the front side of G in the Posi-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri (hereinafter “H

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”. Defendant Mimz Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. concluded an automobile insurance contract with a view to guaranteeing compensation for damages arising from the instant accident caused by the operation, etc. of the instant sea vehicle, and the Plaintiffs are the wife and children of the Deceased.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Eul's evidence Nos. 1 to 4, video, purport of whole pleading

B. According to the evidence No. 3-21 of evidence No. 3-2 and the court’s video verification result, the deceased had already entered the intersection at the time of the accident in this case, and the defendant D had access to the intersection more than 20km/h of the limitation of left-hand turn signals due to yellow, etc., and had conflict with the deceased. Since the accident in this case conflicts between the deceased’s negligence in violation of signal signals and the Defendant D’s negligence in breach of safety driving duty, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the tort in this case.

However, according to the above evidence, the deceased entered the intersection after his direction signals, etc. had already been changed to red, etc., and the deceased's negligence is deemed 80% and the defendants' responsibility is limited to 20%.

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of damages, it shall be excluded as stated in the separate sheet of calculation of damages, and it shall be rejected that the parties’ arguments are not separately explained.

sub-paragraph (b) of this section.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.25 2019나77233

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.09 2020나12508

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.9.9. 선고 2020나12508 판결

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.09 2017나63827

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.17 2015나30205