The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant, or that the defendant has been punished for three times or for drinking driving, and the one time of which was sentenced to the suspension of execution, but the defendant committed the crime of this case where the driver drives the vehicle without obtaining again a driver's license while drinking alcohol, not against the period of the suspension of execution according to the judgment sentenced to the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the crime of this case is committed without obtaining again a driver's license while drinking alcohol, and the blood alcohol concentration of the defendant is considerably high to 0.113%, etc., which are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and the environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable and unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.