beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 19,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from April 30, 2014 to December 17, 2014.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition (1) B, around 14:00 on April 30, 2014, driving C D D Dump truck (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) led the Deceased to die with a long-term damage to plebing part of the Defendant vehicle by taking the front side of the Defendant’s front part of the Mad D (hereinafter “the deceased”) driving on the right side of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle to the right side in the direction of the running side of the Madro vehicle, and thereby making it difficult for the Deceased to check whether there is a vehicle crossing by reducing or temporarily stopping the speed, as it is a place where traffic control is not carried out. As such, even if the Defendant’s vehicle is not carried out, it was negligent in performing the duty to check whether there is a vehicle crossing by reducing or temporarily stopping the speed, and thereby, caused the Deceased’s death by damaging the plebing part from the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.
(2) The Plaintiff is the only heir of the deceased as his child, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.
[Grounds for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-5, 8-10, Eul evidence No. 1 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff who is the bereaved family member due to the death of the deceased due to the accident in this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.
C. However, according to the above evidence, although the deceased had a duty to properly examine the progress of the surrounding vehicle while driving the shooting distance, the driver of the Defendant vehicle did not properly look at the driver’s intent to drive the shooting distance while driving the shooting distance, and caused the accident in this case. Although the deceased entered the shooting distance first, even if the deceased entered the shooting distance of this case, such error of the accident in this case occurred and the damage occurred.