logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.12.03 2015구합55578
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. On December 22, 2014, the Defendant’s refusal to disclose information on the investigation records listed in the attached Table against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On December 17, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a request with the Defendant for the disclosure of information listed in the separate sheet. However, on December 22, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition rejecting disclosure on the ground that the aforementioned information constitutes information subject to non-disclosure pursuant to Article 9(1)4 and 6 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”).

(hereinafter referred to as "disposition in this case"). 【No dispute exists, entry of Gap evidence No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The information the Plaintiff claimed to the Defendant does not constitute information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1) of the Information Disclosure Act.

B. Defendant’s assertion 1) Information that the Plaintiff requested disclosure includes various methods and procedures of investigation, such as written opinions, reports on the place of offense, and reports on the results of investigation, and the disclosure of the above information would make it difficult for the suspect whose indictment was suspended to institute and maintain prosecution by destroying relevant evidence or preparing other technical measures. Since investigation techniques used to arrest hacking offenders are open to the public, making it considerably difficult for investigation agencies to perform their duties in the future, it constitutes information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)4 of the Information Disclosure Act. 2) Information that the Plaintiff requested disclosure includes the protocol of interrogation, written statement, etc., and each of the above documents contains the name, resident registration number, etc. of the person who made the statement, and thus constitutes information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(

3. Determination

A. According to the content of the information that the Plaintiff seeks to disclose and the result of the non-disclosure review conducted by this court, the content of the information that the Plaintiff seeks to disclose is as follows:

The grounds for non-disclosure and whether non-disclosure recognized in paragraphs (b) and (c) below the grounds for non-disclosure of the list of documents shall be stated together with the above list for convenience.

One written opinion on whether to disclose it; 1.

arrow