1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is all dismissed.

3. The defendant is the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant issued a card on October 11, 2001, and was issued a Samsung Electronic Tbbbus scoper card by Samsung Credit Card Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Scopic Credit Card”).

B. After the occurrence of the obligation, the Defendant, using the above card, was liable for the card loan loan amounting to KRW 8,00,000 on Samsung Credit Card on July 16, 2002, for the cash service use amounting to KRW 4,500,000 on July 30, 2002, for the cash service use amounting to KRW 4,50,000 on August 29, 2002, and for the cash service use amounting to KRW 4,50,000 on August 29, 202 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant bonds or obligations”).

C. The Defendant partially repaid the instant credit card loan loan amount of KRW 341,00,000, out of the instant credit card loan loan amount, to Samsung Credit Card Co., Ltd.

The Samsung Credit Card Co., Ltd. transferred the instant claim to a limited liability company specializing in the securitization on April 30, 2003 (the principal of the claim 16,659,000 overdue interest of KRW 832,610) in accordance with the Asset-Backed Securitization Act. On May 24, 2003, Samsung Credit Card Co., Ltd. notified the Defendant of the fact. (2) On March 31, 2008, 2008, Samsung Credit Card Co., Ltd. transferred the instant claim to the Promotion Savings Bank Co., Ltd., and on December 28, 201, the Promotion Savings Bank Co., Ltd., Ltd., which entrusted the notification and notified the Defendant of the fact on May 24, 2012.

3) Thereafter, on July 31, 2013, the Korea Asset Management Loan Co., Ltd. stated the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s succeeding intervenor in the instant claim (the notice of assignment of the principal of the claim amounting to KRW 16,896,340, the principal amount of the claim is KRW 16,896,340, but such written notice seems to have been written in 16,659,000.

The plaintiff's successor to the case assigned overdue interest 49,210,987 won, and the plaintiff notified the defendant of the notification of the transfer. [The plaintiff's successor to the case does not have any dispute over the grounds for recognition, entry in Byung or evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. The judgment of the Plaintiff’s claim is based on the facts of recognition.