A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 25, 2014, the Defendant, at the “D” office located in the window C of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, around 11:00, there is a machine with the victim E, “The victim E, who is a favorable washing floor in a factory located in the Gu Government-si.”

The purport was that the machine can be supplied, so it would be called that the down payment should be deposited into the account designated by the internal government upon the request of purchase.

However, even if the defendant received the money from the injured party as the down payment, he was only willing to use it for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc., and actually did not have the intention or ability to deliver the above machinery to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 1.3 million won from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of F, which is the mother of the Defendant, from the injured party on the same day.

2. On April 2014, the Defendant, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, was unable to supply the machinery to the victim as “the factory in the city of Speaker is related to the Sewol ferry.”

The machinery, which is favorable to the factory in Jeonju, has a washing machine, will be supplied.

Sending an additional down payment

G. The purport of “assumed” was to the same effect.

However, even if the defendant received the money from the injured party as the down payment, he was only willing to use it for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc., and actually did not have the intention or ability to deliver the above machinery to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received each transfer of KRW 1.4 million from the victim’s false statement to the said Agricultural Cooperative Account in F’s name around May 1, 2014, and KRW 8.4 million to the same account around May 7, 2014, and acquired KRW 9.8 million in total from the victim.

3. On May 10, 2014, the Defendant called the victim’s telephone to the effect that “it is necessary to supply the free washing machine in the front line to the day, and to change the mobile expenses.”

However, the facts are the machinery of the defendant from damage.