The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not interfere with the victim's work by force as stated in the judgment of the court below, and even if the defendant exercised force and interfered with the victim's work, the defendant properly resisted about delayed issuance of medical records. Thus, the defendant's act is justified and thus dismissed as a legitimate act.

2. The evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court (hereinafter “instant dental practice”)

) The statement of the person who visited the patient] i.e., F made a statement that the Defendant “I am at this hospital that I am at this hospital. I am in the patient waiting room,” “I am slick outside of the clinic, but she was given late 30 minutes or more because I am slick outside of the clinic,” and H stated that “I am slick outside of the clinic, I am well-known, although I am well-known, I am slick in the public health clinic, I am slick, and am slick in the medical clinic, and I am am slick in the medical clinic, and I am am slick in the medical clinic, and I am am am slick in the medical clinic, and I am am am slick in the medical clinic, as stated in the judgment of the court below.”

On the other hand, whether a certain act is justified as an act that does not contravene the social norms and the illegality is excluded should be determined on an individual basis by considering the following specific circumstances: (a) the legitimacy of the motive or purpose of the act; (b) the reasonableness of the means or method of the act; (c) the balance between the protected interests and the infringed interests; (iv) the urgency of the act; and (v) the supplement of the act that there is no other means or method other than the act.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2006Do9418 Decided March 15, 2007, etc.). The records are recorded.