The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the Defendant’s appeal is that: (a) at the time of the instant case, the Defendant did not shaking a quito B’s face by taking her bath or her hand; and (b) did not receive clothes by deceiving S, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment; and (c) the penalty (one million won) sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

However, in light of the evidence presented by the court below and the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the facts charged in this case, all of the facts charged in this case against the defendant can be recognized. Thus, the defendant's mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles is without merit, and in full view of various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant's wrongful assertion of sentencing is not justified

Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.