logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.07.05 2017고단3909
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who had a relationship with the victim B from around 2002 to around 2006, operated the hospital to pay a lot of profits by operating the hospital to the ordinary victim.

The term "regnentness" and "regnentness" were over.

On September 201, the defendant used the loan to the convalescent business by taking the loan to the victim as the debt holder in the high seas as security at the coffee shop near the victim's residence in Seoul around Seoul around September 201.

It is desirable to register the party as a director of the corporation and pay the monthly salary of KRW 10,000,000 to repay the loan.

The interest on the loan shall be paid at the monthly salary that is paid in full.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendant thought that the Defendant would have used the loan that was granted a loan to the victim’s real estate as security for living expenses, interest on personal debt, stock investment, and interest on the loan, etc., so the Defendant did not intend to use the loan in a convalescent hospital. The Defendant did not pay interest on the loan that was granted a loan to the victim’s real estate as security because the debt of approximately KRW 600 million was accumulated in the absence of a certain amount of income at the time. At that time, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the loan properly because the Defendant did not have any intention to pay the loan due to the fact that the amount of operating profit was less than KRW

On October 20, 201, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) provided real estate, such as Socheon City G, which was owned by the victim as collateral; and (c) borrowed KRW 530 million from the Defendant as debt obligor, the maximum amount of the claim amount of KRW 690 million; and (d) borrowed KRW 530 million; (b) repaid the existing loan amount of KRW 340 million to the victim’s name where the mortgage has already been established on the said real estate; and (c) acquired and acquired the remainder of KRW 190 million by obtaining financial gains equivalent to the security value of KRW 190 million.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow