logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.06.08 2017고정2216
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around April 4, 2017, around 17:50 on April 4, 2017, the Defendant and his/her employees served as the Defendant and his/her employees received KRW 100,000 in return for a male who was found to be a customer, from which the name of the customer could not be known, and arranged a female marina branch to engage in the behavior of similarity of the name of the said customer by using the body part of the body.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C to arrange sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

2. Part of a protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police;

3. A statement of the F;

4. Conversations recorded in the CD.

5. Application of each statute of photograph;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Selective Commercial Sex Acts and Subordinate Statutes concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

2. Grounds for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are to be confined in a workhouse.

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to 30 million won; and

2. The sentencing criteria are not set with respect to the decision of fine for sentencing.

In this case, in collusion with employees C at marina business places operated by the defendant, it is not good that a female marina branch office has engaged in sexual traffic such as arranging sexual traffic so that it may interfere with the similarity of male customers, and it is not good that the crime is committed and the crime is committed.

Such crimes are likely to undermine the sound morals of society in relation to sex, restrict the human rights of female workers, or violate them, so there is a high possibility of criticism.

However, there are more favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the defendant's attitude to reflect, the fact that it seems that the defendant did not make a full-time act such as brokerage of sexual traffic at marina business places operated by the defendant, but it is likely that it would be able to receive a similar teaching activity along with marina will, and that there is no record of punishment for sexual traffic crime.

The above points and the defendant's age, sexual behavior, etc.

arrow