Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 10, 2015, the Defendant was under the control of Police Officer D, a police officer, due to the fact that he was unclaimedd on the road in front of the Dongdong-gu, U.S. on September 10, 2015, and the Defendant was found to have failed to pay a fine of KRW 400,000,000, and was transferred to the E district by the head of the sentence execution.

Upon entering the E District, the Defendant sent tobacco out of the District Zone while smoking the tobacco, and the Inspector F, who is the police officer belonging to the said District, did not smoke in the state of being detained upon issuance of a writ of execution by the prosecutor due to the unpaid penalty.

As the Defendant was at the time of the word “,” the Defendant was “as feas, Mamo, Mamo, Mamo

D. In the Republic of Korea, the Defendant 1 expressed his desire to “I am to avoid tobacco,” and attached tobacco and strings in the strings to the strings, and the Defendant 2 failed to do so. The police officer resisted that I would be at the time of the police officer, and then she resisted to the above police officer, and then, she shotfe, shotfe, shotfe, shotf, and shotfe. shotf, shotf, and then, she live later.

I see. I am kn't kn't kn't kn't.

C. Nynae, Nynae, Nye, Nye, I do not need to do so.

“In doing so, the said police officer and his/her family members expressed their attitude to harm the life and body of the police officer and his/her family members, and threatened the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant, through intimidation, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of crimes F, who are police officials and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and D;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is justified and the police officer who duly executes the public authority is trying to challenge the police officer.