1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On April 24, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant-related Plaintiff were a company that operates a building business, and the Defendant was employed by the Plaintiff and worked as the site manager of the building project for the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building in the Namyang-ju, the Plaintiff was under construction (hereinafter “instant construction project”), and retired on March 21,

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant, without the plaintiff's approval, has consulted with the owner of the building and the change of materials in the form of the project in relation to the construction of this case, and has the subcontractor confirm and sign a change in the terms of the contract with respect to the changed materials, thereby allowing the plaintiff to pay the additional construction cost to the subcontractor, but the owner did not recognize the additional construction cost, thereby causing losses as shown in the attached Form to the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant should pay the damages and the damages for delay to

3. It is not enough to find the fact that the Defendant voluntarily consulted with the owner of the building and ordered the changed material without the Plaintiff’s approval, solely on the basis of each description of Gap’s 1, Gap’s 2, 4, and Gap’s 3-1 through 8, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

(M) In light of the above, the Plaintiff’s representative director and the Plaintiff’s representative director and the owner of the instant construction project concluded the instant construction contract on personal-friendly basis, and there is no dispute between the parties, and comprehensively considering the overall purport of the pleadings, the Defendant reported the change of materials to the Plaintiff, or the Plaintiff’s representative director knew about the change of materials, etc., on the ground of the Plaintiff’s relationship between the Plaintiff’s representative director and the owner of the instant construction project and the owner of the instant construction project, and the fact that the owner of the instant construction project concluded the instant construction contract on April 1, 200.