logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.02.05 2014누54419
장해급여부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 26, 2008, the Plaintiff was appointed as a public official in technical service in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 1, 1989, and served in the traffic guidance division for construction and transportation stations until December 31, 2010. 2) E has a complaint against the change of the traffic method of D, which is located in Seoul, from one traffic to two-way traffic, around August 26, 2008. Around 17:30 on August 26, 2008, the C Community Self-Governing Center in Seoul, the first floor of the C Community Self-Governing Center in Seoul, caused the Plaintiff to live in the shape of the Plaintiff’s flick, and turned out the Plaintiff to two-way.

(3) The Plaintiff caused the instant accident to inflict the injury (hereinafter “the instant injury”) on the salt pans, the urine part of the drilling part, the salt pans, the left pansium part, etc. (hereinafter “instant injury”).

From August 28, 2008 to January 29, 2009, G Hospital located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, Kwon located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and Maidwon located in Guro-gu Seoul, for the instant injury. 4) The Plaintiff claimed reimbursement of the expenses incurred in relation to the instant injury pursuant to Article 35 of the Public Officials Pension Act around that time, and the Defendant decided to pay the expenses incurred in relation to the instant injury as the expenses incurred in relation to the medical care of the injury on October 9, 2008.

At the time, the Plaintiff claimed payment of expenses incurred in performing medical care in the interest of care for the verte inverte in the part of the vertebrate. The Defendant rejected the payment of expenses incurred in performing medical care for the reason that it cannot be deemed that the said disease was caused by the instant accident.

B. On April 9, 2009, the Plaintiff claimed the payment of expenses incurred in relation to the escape of a conical signboard, and the Defendant’s refusal 1) from February 24, 2009 to March 22, 2010, the Plaintiff received medical treatment for the escape of a conical signboard No. 3-4 from the O oriental medical hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul N, for the escape of the conical signboard No. 5, and the escape of the conical signboard No. 5. 1. 2) on April 9, 2009.

arrow