Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 3, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million by the Seoul Eastern District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 00:30 on November 19, 2019, the Defendant asserted that the blood alcohol concentration is not correct from approximately 2.4km section of approximately 0.127% of the blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving to the front road of the “E” located in the “E” in the front of the “E” as “E” located in the wife population B at Chicago-si, and that the Defendant and his defense counsel are not correct. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the Defendant is sufficiently confirmed that the Defendant driven the blood alcohol concentration at around 0.127%, and the above assertion is without merit.

He driven a H 125C motorcycle while under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of the I;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Investigation report (report on telephone conversations of a suspect) and investigation report (verification of distance of drinking driving);

1. Notice of the results of the drinking driving control and the record of drinking measurement;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, reply reports, investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has the history of having been punished two times or more by the Defendant for a drunk driving, and since June 25, 2019, the penal provision for a drunk driving was strengthened, and the Defendant was also able to easily understand the above circumstances through the media, etc., and there is a need for the Defendant to be punished with severe punishment in the event that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol driving, and that the Defendant denied the instant crime at an investigative agency.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case.