A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On January 9, 2016, from around 17:00 to 18:00, the Defendant administered a medication by dilution with Mepta (one philoopon) approximately 0.03g of Mepta (one philoopon), which is a local mental medicine, in a malculmatic method, between Yangsan-si and 305 Yangsan City.

2. On January 20, 2016, at around 18:00, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03 g of phiphones in the aforesaid manner at the same place as the above 1. paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on narcotics appraisal;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1), and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under Article 60 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. 추징 마약류 관리에 관한 법률 제 67조 단서 [ 양형이 유] 양형기준 : 징역 1년 ~ 4년 6월 ☞ 각 투약 가중영역 (3 년 이내 집행유예 이상 동종 전과, 징역 1년 ~3 년 )으로, 다수범죄처리기준이 적용됨 동종 범행으로 집행유예기간 중이었음에도 아무런 자숙함 없이 이 사건 범행을 저지른 점 결국 이 사건 범행으로 인해 위 집행유예가 취소되었다{ 울산 지법 2016. 2. 4. 자 2016 초기 101 결정( 확정)}. 등을 종합하여 실형을 선택하되, 기록과 변론에 나타난 범행 경위, 반성태도 등 여러 정상을 아울러 참작하여 양형기준 범위 내에서 주문과 같이 형을 정함