logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2016.07.20 2016나85
임대차보증금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Defendant alleged to the effect that the instant lease agreement is not “for receiving actual money,” but “the best contract to obtain related authorization or permission,” while it comes to the trial. However, even if all evidence including the evidence submitted by the Defendant in the trial, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the Defendant’s argument.” If so, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow