Defendants are not guilty. The summary of each judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Defendant B is the representative director of G Co., Ltd., and Defendant A is engaged in the distribution business, and Defendant B is a person who operates G with Defendant B.

1. Defendant B and Defendant A conspired to receive user fees through a trademark use agreement with regard to some designated goods of the above Apanishian headquarters or domestic owner of the trademark, knowing that Defendant B and Defendant A applied for a new trademark "Esperienza" in the old Libera Design, which is widely known in Korea as the owner of the trademark right of the above Spain (hereinafter referred to as the "Esperienza").

이에 따라 피고인 A는 2013. 3. 초순경 서울 강동구 H에 있는 상호를 알 수 없는 호프집에서 피해자 I에게 ‘에스페리언자(Esperienza)라는 상표는 구찌오구찌라는 이태리 명품가문에서 새로 런칭하는 브랜드로서 국내 독점적 상표사용권을 보유하고 있으니 3,000만 원에 우산, 장갑, 목도리 등 3종 품목에 대한 독점사용권을 주겠다.’라고 말하고, 피해자가 위 에스페리언자 상표의 지명도가 낮다며 계약에 소극적인 태도를 보이자 그 무렵 '2013. 5. 20.경까지 이탈리아 본사와 라이센스 계약을 체결하여 에스페리언자 상표 하단에 『디자인 바이 구찌오구찌』라는 상표권자 표기를 사용할 수 있게 하여 주겠다.

On May 2, 2013, Defendant B entered into a trademark agency agreement with the victim, which permits the exclusive license of KRW 30,000,000,000 of the above Espanishian registered trademark, among the above Espanishian registered trademark, with the victim at K's office located in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul.

However, the Defendants entered into an exclusive use agreement between L with respect to six registered trademarks among the Spanishian trademarks, but the above L is a domestic owner of the trademark, Ma and N, which is a new owner of the trademark.