The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, which maintained the reasoning of the court below, the court below was just to have convicted all of the charges of obstruction of duties, obstruction of performance of official duties and injury on August 15, 2012, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and there was no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles on freedom of religion, obstruction of official duties, and crime of injury, etc., by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, thereby violating the logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

In addition, all of the arguments in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the obstruction of performance of official duties and the right of defense and the right of citizen non-conformity cited in the grounds of appeal, as to obstruction of performance of official duties and injury on October 5, 2012, misapprehension of legal principles, omission of judgment, omission of judgment, and admissibility of CCTV videos and photographs, are asserted in the grounds of appeal only in the absence of the defendant's grounds of appeal or the court below's ex officio decision, and there is no violation of law as otherwise alleged in the judgment below.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.