1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part resulting from the intervention is the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

1. The grounds alleged in the trial by the defendant and the defendant joining the court of first instance do not differ from those already alleged in the first instance. However, the first instance court’s determination that the grounds for the disciplinary action in this case are recognized and appropriate is justifiable, considering the review of the respective descriptions of the evidence No. 4-1, No. 2, No. 5-1, and No. 5-2, which were submitted in the trial of the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court’s entry is as follows: (a) the part on November 13, 191 in the second 11-12 of the judgment of the court of first instance is deleted; and (b) the part on “2011.” in the 8th 10th 10 and 9th 16th 16th 16th 201 are the same as the entry on the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part on “2011............”; and (c) the same is cited in accordance with

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.