A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

60,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On October 20, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to KRW 156,00,000 as a surcharge on October 15, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence at the astronomical Prison on April 15, 2013, for a bribe offered in the Daejeon District Court’s Branch.

[Basic Facts] C as the representative director of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) for real estate development business, etc., around October 21, 2014, which was implemented by the above D from E Si around the Frane on and around October 21, 2014, obtained a construction permit for the construction work, and filed an application for the approval of the housing construction plan around November 18, 2014 with E around that time.

C agreed upon the approval of sale by the end of December 2014 with H, a contractor, to obtain the approval of sale by the end of December, 2014, if the contract with H could be terminated, it was required to obtain the approval of sale by the end of December 2014. On the other hand, while the E market price held a review committee around December 5, 2014, it was planned to obtain the approval of sale through the E public officials who are easy to contact with the public officials of the E to easily approve the sale on the land owned by the Ministry of National Defense, on the grounds of the issue of acquiring the title of sale and transfer, the issue of determining the sale price, etc.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the known player) operates “I” (the trade name after revision: J) on behalf of the Defendant for the authorization procedure, etc. of the apartment execution project.

The defendant was in office as a public official in the D Office of the operation of the above C around December 7, 2014, and as a public official in E.

Along with the purport that “in Korea, it is the motive of E market and middle school, and public officials are also aware of it, so it would be possible to sell it in lots with the approval from December 19, 2014,” the Defendant’s passage through the Defendant was limited as if it could be approved for sale.

On December 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around December 11, 201, to the public officials in charge of granting approval for sale.