A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates (State)C.

On August 17, 2017, the Defendant concluded a travel contract with the victim E on December 4, 2017, 200: “19 persons, total number of 19 persons, total 13,310,000 won for travel expenses” from November 30, 2017 to KRW 5,225,00,00 for the victim’s deposit of KRW 5,225,00 for the travel expenses, at the office of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office of 102.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to use the money as the party’s travel expense even if he received the money from the injured party, since around February 2016, when he received the travel expense from the first priority tour contractor and received the payment of the travel expense from the first priority tour contractor, and made a report on the closure of the business on November 3, 2017.

The Defendant received from the injured party a total of KRW 13,310,000 in total four times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form, including the receipt of KRW 5,225,00 under the name of a national bank account (Account Number:F) in the name of C on the same day from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning data capturing the Kakao Stockholm;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense. Article 347 (1) of the said Act

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that in light of the nature and content of the crime in this case, the nature of the crime and the criminal circumstances are not somewhat weak, and that the crime was committed despite the past record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the Defendant’s liability is not weak.

However, the defendant is against the victim, and the victim is against the Korea Travel Business Association.